World Liberty Financial faces CFIUS review on $500M UAE deal

Senators request CFIUS review of $500M UAE investment in WLFI

On February 13, 2026, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D–MA) and Andy Kim (D–NJ) asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to determine whether a reported $500 million purchase of a 49% stake in the Trump‑linked World Liberty Financial (WLFI) by a UAE‑government‑linked investor should be reviewed by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), as reported by The Block. The request identifies G42/Aryam Investment, linked to Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, as the buyer and notes the timing as days before the January 2025 inauguration. The senators set a response deadline of March 5.

The letter effectively asks Treasury to assess whether the investment falls within the scope of U.S. national‑security screening for foreign ownership or control. WLFI is a crypto and fintech venture, and the lawmakers argue the combination of capital, governance rights, and data exposure warrants a closer look.

Why World Liberty Financial (WLFI) stake raises national security concerns

A central concern is potential access to sensitive personal data and strategic technologies that could flow from a large foreign stake in a U.S. financial‑technology platform. According to Accountable.US, the deal also raises ethics and conflict‑of‑interest questions involving WLFI’s leadership and possible avenues for foreign influence.

Lawmakers say these risks are amplified by the investor’s reported ties and the transaction’s timing relative to U.S. technology policy debates. “Significant national security concerns,” said Senator Elizabeth Warren, in her letter to Secretary Bessent.

Further scrutiny has come from other lawmakers. Senator Chris Murphy characterized related payments as potentially criminal if tied to policy favors, as reported by BitDegree.

What changes now: Treasury response timeline and potential scrutiny

What changes immediately is process and timeline. By March 5, Treasury is expected to indicate whether the reported transaction is within CFIUS’s jurisdiction and whether additional information or agency consultations are warranted.

If the matter proceeds, scrutiny could center on who controls governance rights at WLFI, what categories of user or transactional data the platform collects, how that data is protected, and whether any exposure intersects with export‑control sensitivities around advanced AI chips. The lawmakers have also sought clarity on board appointments, funding flows, and due diligence underlying the deal.

Possible CFIUS outcomes by March 5: what to watch

Several outcomes are possible by early March. Treasury could determine the deal does not fall under CFIUS authority, acknowledge jurisdiction and request further information, or signal that a deeper interagency review is warranted focused on governance and data‑access risk.

Investors and policy observers will be watching for whether officials probe any nexus between the investment and U.S. policy on advanced technologies, and for any commitments around data handling or board independence that might be discussed. Continued congressional oversight is likely given the ethics and national‑security questions already raised.

At the time of this writing, Trump Media & Technology Group (DJT) last traded around $11.05 in after‑hours, up 0.64%, after a one‑year decline of about 63%, based on data from Yahoo Finance. This market backdrop does not determine CFIUS outcomes, but it frames investor sensitivity to headline risk around Trump‑linked ventures.