Michael Saylor Criticizes Onchain Proof-of-Reserves Amidst Security Concerns

Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy, has criticized onchain proof-of-reserves, citing potential security risks during a recent discussion held in May 2025.

The criticism highlights the ongoing debate about cryptocurrency security, potentially influencing corporate Bitcoin adoption strategies and prompting industry responses.

Michael Saylor Challenges Onchain Proof-of-Reserve Security

Michael Saylor, known for advocating corporate Bitcoin adoption, recently raised concerns over the security of onchain proof-of-reserves. While discussing potential vulnerabilities, the CEO underlined Bitcoin’s role as a robust corporate asset. Saylor remarked, “Bitcoin is not just an asset but the Apex capital strategy for companies seeking long-term growth, durability, and relevance in the AI age.” – Bitcoin for Corporations 2025 Keynote

MicroStrategy, under Saylor’s leadership, has amassed over 2% of Bitcoin’s supply, demonstrating its commitment to Bitcoin as a treasury asset. This focus continues despite concerns over onchain security practices.

Saylor’s Comments May Influence Cryptocurrency Regulations

Saylor’s remarks could influence regulatory discussions on ensuring secure cryptocurrency transactions. The industry may need to address discovered weaknesses to maintain confidence in digital asset technologies.

Skeptics highlight that MicroStrategy’s large Bitcoin holdings could risk volatility if market confidence waivers. Historical trends show such comments might lead to increased scrutiny of corporate blockchain strategies. – February 2025 Interview

Historical Debates Inform Current Proof-of-Reserves Discussion

Comparable instances, like past debates about blockchain security, inform understanding of potential outcomes. Historical scrutiny on proof-of-reserves has sparked market reflections on best practices.

Experts from Kanalcoin suggest Saylor’s stance might prompt regulatory focus on securing digital assets. Historical precedents support the need for evolving practices in cryptocurrency management.