MSCIโs proposal to exclude companies with over 50% digital assets, like MicroStrategy, from major indexes is under consideration after consultation.
Exclusion risks impacting U.S. capital market dynamics and innovation, with potential forced asset reallocation.
MSCI Considers Removing Crypto-Heavy Firms from Indices
MSCI is consulting on a plan to exclude companies with over 50% of digital assets from its equity indices. Strategy, formerly MicroStrategy, argues this move could harm U.S. national security, capital markets, and digital innovation.
MSCIโs proposal primarily impacts Strategy, led by Michael Saylor, which holds a significant Bitcoin treasury. Strategyโs letter warns against an exclusion that could affect innovation and investment in digital assets, citing U.S. pro-innovation policies.
Proposed MSCI Move Threatens $2.8 Billion in Outflows
Strategy estimates a $2.8 billion forced outflow, should the proposed exclusion proceed. Potential consequences include increased equity volatility and higher costs for Bitcoin-heavy corporates, with broader implications for Bitcoin exposure.
Historical trends indicate similar exclusions have led to structural constraints on market access. Analysts view these actions as problematic for long-term digital asset growth, despite being consistent with previous index adjustments in other sectors.
Historical Parallels with Tobacco and Fossil Fuel Exclusions
Comparable exclusion actions have historically affected sectors like tobacco and fossil fuels, which resulted in adjusted index weights and varied capital impacts. This proposal mirrors such strategies but focuses on digital currency treasuries.
Authors in the space suggest that if executed, this approach could distort capital allocation away from digital assets. Experts anticipate potential market shifts toward more direct Bitcoin investments, as indirect equity exposure declines.
Quotes and Industry Insights
Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman & co-founder of Strategy, has expressed concern: โThe proposalโs threshold is discriminatory, arbitrary, and unworkable, as it would penalize companies holding large asset concentrations without considering the broader market implications.โ
| Disclaimer: This website provides information only and is not financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments are risky. We do not guarantee accuracy and are not liable for losses. Conduct your own research before investing. |