Aave DAO Considers Reducing Multichain Strategy

Aave’s DAO is reviewing its multichain strategy. The proposal suggests deprecating zkSync, Metis, and Soneium. This arises from an analysis revealing that over 86.6% of the platform’s revenue comes from Ethereum’s mainnet. Marc Zeller, a delegate at Aave, remarked, “At this point in time more than half of the Aave instances across L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on YTD data, more than 86.6% of Aave revenue is made on Mainnet; it is now increasingly clear that everything else is a side quest.” Source: Aave Governance Forum, November 2025

Marc Zeller, a prominent delegate, noted that non-mainnet instances are economically unviable. Recommendations include reallocating resources to more profitable chains like Ethereum and Arbitrum. Aave’s governance forum facilitated discussions among delegates and contributors.

Aave Eyes Deprecation of zkSync, Metis, Soneium

Aave’s DAO is reviewing its multichain strategy. The proposal suggests deprecating zkSync, Metis, and Soneium. This arises from an analysis revealing that over 86.6% of the platform’s revenue comes from Ethereum’s mainnet. Marc Zeller, a delegate at Aave, remarked, “At this point in time more than half of the Aave instances across L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on YTD data, more than 86.6% of Aave revenue is made on Mainnet; it is now increasingly clear that everything else is a side quest.” Source: Aave Governance Forum, November 2025

Marc Zeller, a prominent delegate, noted that non-mainnet instances are economically unviable. Recommendations include reallocating resources to more profitable chains like Ethereum and Arbitrum. Aave’s governance forum facilitated discussions among delegates and contributors.

Potential Liquidity Boost for Ethereum’s Economic Viability

Deprecating certain chains might consolidate liquidity on Ethereum, impacting smaller chains. The $50 million annual buyback remains unaffected. Community sentiment is mixed, with debates focusing on efficiency versus DeFi accessibility.

While Aave remains committed to its multichain objectives, the DAO emphasizes profitability and resource optimization. Historical governance moves, like the planned Aave v4 Upgrade Enhancing Capital Efficiency, indicate potential positive outcomes, guiding future strategies and focus areas.

Aave’s Historical Chain Withdrawals Indicate Long-term Strategy

Aave’s previous withdrawals from chains like Avalanche and Fantom parallel this strategy. These changes often follow revenue assessments and influence the crypto landscape significantly, showcasing a consistent approach toward resource management.

Experts from Kanalcoin foresee a continued focus on Ethereum’s mainnet, predicting consolidated liquidity and sustainable growth. This aligns with Aave’s past decisions, as noted in the Aave Development Update – August 2025, positioning it strategically within the DeFi arena.